Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Akhilesh
- Effect of Age of Plant on Compatibility Levels in Mid-Late Maturity Group of Cauliflower (Brassica oleracea L. Var. Botrytis)
Abstract Views :190 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 40, No 2 (2014), Pagination: 137-140Abstract
Studies were carried out on six genotypes (PalamUphar, DPCa Y-2, DPCa Y-3, DPCa Y-4, DPCa Y-5 and DPCa Y-6) of mid-late group of cauliflower at Experimental Farm of the Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur during the period from September 2010 to June 2011 to find out the levels of compatibility. The pollination treatments included self-pollination in open flowers at 25% flowering (OP-I), self-pollination in open flowers at 50- 75% flowering (OP-II) and self-pollination in open flowers at more than 75% flowering (OP-III). Majority of the plants in all the genotypes studied were in the compatibility grade 0-10 per cent, whereas, there was little change in the genotypes DPCa Y-2, DPCa Y-3, DPCa Y-4, DPCa Y-5 and DPCa Y-6 for the number of plants in the compatibility grade 0-10 except PalamUphar (OP-III). Hence, those plants falling in 0-10 compatibility grade can be used for the isolation of S-allele homozygotes for the development of selfincompatible lines for hybrid development.Keywords
Compatibility Levels, Cauliflower, Pollination, S-Allele.Full Text
- Breeding Vegetables for Protected Cultivation: A Review
Abstract Views :71 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
2 Department of Genetics and Plant Breeding, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 47, No 1 (2021), Pagination: 1-17Abstract
Protected cultivation of vegetable crops was given a high priority and developed very rapidly during the past 15 years in India. Initially, vegetable cultivars commonly used for open field production were also started to grown under protected conditions. Despite various measures, many problems arose due to unfavorable ecological conditions in protected environments. Since the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, breeding of vegetable cultivars for protected conditions has been carried out by taking advantages of both conventional methods and biotechnological tools. One of the main research efforts include screening and evaluation of breeding materials for tolerance to various biotic and abiotic stresses. Another effort focused on the creation and development of new breeding materials (variety, cultivar or breeding line) for protected conditions by selection, introduction, crossing and biotechnological methods, including isolating from popular F genotypes, wide crosses, tissue and 1 cell culture, protoplast regeneration, gene transfer techniques, molecular marker assisted breeding and many other approaches. As most hydroponic cultivation and grafting tools are carried out inside the protected conditions, more cultivars adapted to this type of culture are also urgently needed.Keywords
Breeding, Grafting, Hydroponic, Protected Cultivation, Vegetable.Full Text
References
- Adetula OA. 2006. Genetic diversity of Capsicum using random amplified polymorphic DNAs. African Journal of Biotechnology 5: 120-22.
- Allard RW. 1960. Principles of Plant Breeding. John Wiley & Sons Inc, New York, 485pp.
- Altunlu H and Gul A. 2012. Increasing drought tolerance of tomato plants by grafting. Acta Horticulture 960: 18390. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.960.26
- Anonymous. 2018. Economy of India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy of India.
- Baille A. 2001. Trends in greenhouse technology for improved climate control in mild winter climates. Acta Hortulture 559 : 161-67. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.559.23.
- Balashov ES. 2006. Features of growth and development of new tomato hybrids under cultivation in the extended cycle of winter glazed greenhouse. Ph D thesis, AllRussian Research Institute of Vegetable Growing, Moscow.
- Bhardwaj A. 2017. Development of parthenocarpic gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) for protected cultivation. Ph D thesis, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur.
- Bhatt RM, Upreti KK, Divya MH, Bhat S, Pavithra CB and Sadashiva AT. 2015. Interspeciûc grafting to enhance physiological resilience to flooding stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Scientia Horticulture 182: 8-17.
- Bosland PW and Votava EJ. (Eds), 2012. Peppers. In: Vegetable and Spice Capsicums J. Atherton and A. Rees (Eds.), CABI Publishing, 19999.
- Campbell RN and Grogan RC. 1963. Big-vein virus of lettuce and its transmission by Olpidium brassicae. Phytopathology 53: 252-59.
- Castilla N, Hernandez J and Abou-Hadid AF. 2004. Strategic crop and greenhouse management in mild winter climate areas. Acta Horticulture 633: 183-96. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.633.22
- Chandra P, Sirohi PS, Behera TK and Singh AK. 2000. Cultivating vegetables in polyhouse. Indian Horticulture 45: 17-25.
- Cheema DS, Singh N and Jindal SK. 2013. Evaluation of indeterminate tomato hybrids for fruit, yield and quality traits under net house and open field conditions. Vegetable Science 40: 45-49.
- Chen HX and Cao PS. 1994. Parthenocarpy of cucumber. China Vegetable 3: 56-59.
- Davis AR, Perkins-Veazie P, Hassell R, Levi A, King SR and Zhang X. 2008. Grafting effects on vegetable quality. Horticulture Science 43: 1670-72.
- Dhaliwal MS and Jindal SK. 2017. Development of Cherry tomato variety from interspecific cross (Solanum lycopersicum and Solanum pimpinellifoilium) for protected cultivation. Agriculture Research Journal 54: 182-187.
- Dinuba CA, Singh DK and Tewari D. 2009. Polyhouse breeding of tomato. Agropedia http://agropedia.iitk.ac.in/content/polyhouse-breedingtomato.
- Epstein L, Kaur S, Chang P, Carrasquilla-Garcia N, Lyu G, Cook D, Subbarao K and O’Donnell K. 2017. Races of the celery pathogen. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii are polyphyletic. Phytopathology 107: 463-73. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-04-16-0174-R
- FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization). 2013. Good agricultural practices for greenhouse vegetable Crops.
- FAO plant production and protection paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
- Feng C, Correll JC, Kammeijer KE and Koike ST. 2014. Identification of new races and deviating strains of the spinach downy mildew pathogen. Peronospora
- farinose f. sps pinaciae. Plant Disease 98: 145-52. doi: 10.1094/pdis-04-13-0435-re.
- Feng C, Saito K, Liu B, Manley A, Kammeijer K, Mauzey SJ, Koike S and Correll JC. 2018. New races and novel strains of the spinach downy mildew pathogen Peronospora effuse. Plant Disease 102: 613-18. doi: 10.1094/pdis-05-17-0781-re.
- Flores FB, Sanchez-Bel P, Estan MT, Morales B, Campos JF and Egea MI. 2010. The effectiveness of grafting to improve tomato fruit quality. Scientia Horticulture 125: 211-17. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1016/ j.scienta.2010.03.026.
- Foolad MR. 2007. Genome mapping and molecular breeding of tomato. International Journal of Plant Genomics, 64358. doi:10.1155/2007/64358.
- Garibaldi A, Baudino M, Minuto A and Gullino ML. 2008. Effectiveness of fumigants and grafting against tomato brown root rot caused by Colletotrichum coccodes. Phytoparasitica 36: 483-88.
- Gavrish SF. 2015. Modern hybrids tomato and cucumber. Gavrish 4: 25.
- Gazquez JC, Perez C, Meca DE, Segura MD, Domene MA, Lopez JC and Buendia D. 2017. Evaluation of different training systems and crop densities to increase greenhouse tomato rocution and profitablility in the Mediterranean area. Acta Horticulture 1170: 777-82. doi: 10.17660/acta horticulture.2017.1170.99
- Gilardi G, Colla P, Pugliese M, Baudino M, Gullino ML and Garibaldi A. 2014. Control of Colletotrichum coccodes on tomato by grafting and soil amendments. Journal of Phytopathology 162: 116-23. doi: 10.1111/jph.12162
- Goncharova NA, Van Der VA and Verstegen JAAM. 2004. Changes in horticulture sector in the Netherlands. Acta Horticulture 655: 319-31. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.655.39
- Green SK. 1986. Virus disease of tomato and Chinese cabbage in Taiwan and source of resistance. Plant virus diseases of horticultural crops in the tropics & subtropics. AVRDC , pp.71-83.
- Greenleaf WH. 1986. Pepper Breeding. In: Breeding Vegetable Crops, Westport, USA, AVI Publishing Co., pp 67-134.
- Heuberger H, Praeger U, Georgi M, Schirrmacher G, Grabmann J and Schnitzler WH. 2004. Precision stressing by UV-B rafiation to improve quality of spinach under protected cultivation. Proc. VII IS on Prot Cult Mild Winter Climates (Eds. Cantliffe D J, Stoffella P J and Shaw N) Acta Horticulture 659, 20106.
- Hochmuth GJ and Hochmuth R. 2009. Blossom-end rot in bell pepper: causes and prevention. SL 284, Institute of Food and Agriculture Science, University of Florida, pp. 5.
- Hou F, Wenyun C, Zhenrong H, Shuju L and Dehua M. 1995. New cucumber variety for sunlight greenhouse cultivation - Jinchun No. 3. China Vegetable 2: 6-8.
- Irish BM, Correll JC, Feng C, Bentley T and De Los Reyes BG. 2008. Characterization of a resistance locus (Pfs1) to the spinach downy mildew pathogen (Peronospora farinosef.spspinaciae) and development of a molecular marker linked to Pfs-1. Phytopathology 98: 894-900. doi: 10.1094/phyto-98-8-0894
- Jang Y, Yang E, Cho M, Um Y, Ko K, Chun C. 2012. Effect of grafting on growth and incidence of Phytophthora blight and bacterial wilt of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology 53: 9-19. doi: 10.1007/s13580-012-0074-7
- Janick J. 1986. Horticultural Science (4th Edn), Freeman WH and Co., New York, USA, pp 339-46.
- Joshi S and Berke T. 2005. Perspectives of bell pepper breeding. Journal of new seeds 6: 51-74. doi: 10.1300/J153v06n02_04.
- Kacira M. 2011. Greenhouse production in US: status, challenges, and opportunities. In: Presented at CIGR 2011 conference on sustainable bioproduction, Tokyo.
- Kalia P. 2005. Precision protected vegetable cultivation. In: Hi Tech Farming in Vegetable Crops. CAFT in Horticulture (Vegetables), YSP UHF, Nauni, Solan, pp 18-21.
- Kalloo G, Banerjee MK, Kumar S and Prakash C. 2000. Hybrid vegetable technology in India- An overview. In: Kalloo G and Singh K. (Eds.), Emerging Scenario in Vegetable Research and Development. Research Periodicals and Book Publishing House, India, 11-31 pp.
- Karlsson M. 2016. Growing Cucumber in greenhouses. University of Alaska Fairbanks.
- Kim S, Park M and Yeom SI. 2014. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nature Genetics 46: 271-78. doi: 10.1038/ng.2877
- King SR, Davis AR, Liu W and Levi A. 2008. Grafting for disease resistance. Hort Science 43: 1673-76. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.43.6.1673.
- Kohli UK, Amit V, Manish K and Dohroo NP. 2010. Strategy for production of Exotic vegetables in India. In: Exotic Vegetables. Westville Publishing House, New Delhi. pp 120.
- Kubota C, Mcclure MA, Kokalis-Burelle N, Bausher MG and Rosskopf EN. 2008. Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North America. Hort Science 43: 1664-69. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.43.6.1664
- Kumar PY, Rouphael M, Cardarelli G and Colla G. 2017. Vegetable grafting as a tool to improve drought resistance and water use efûciency. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1130. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01130
- Kumar S, Gowda P and Mallikarjuna NM. 2015. Evaluation of selected tomato lines for extended shelf life.SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 47: 32634.
- Kumar S, Kumar R, Kumar D, Gautam N, Dogra RK and Mehta DK. 2016. Parthenocarpicgynoecious parental lines of cucumber introduced from Netherlands for developing high-yielding, quality hybrids. Journal of crop improvement 30: 352-69. doi: 10.1080/ 5427528.2016.1163762
- Kunwar S, Paret ML, Olson SM, Ritchie L, Rich JR, Freeman JH and Mcavoy T. 2015. Grafting root stocks with resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum against Meloidogyne incognita in tomato production. Plant Disease 99: 119-24. doi: 10.1094/pdis-09-13-0936-re
- La Malfa G and Leonardi C. 1993. Crop practices and techniques: trends and needs. Acta Horticulture 559: 31-42. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2001.559.1
- Lee JM and Oda M. 2003. Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental crops. Horticultural Reviews 28: 61124.
- Lee JM, Jahn MM and Yeam I. 2013. Allelic relationships at the pvr1 locus in Capsicum annuum. Euphytica 194: 417-24. doi: 10.1007/s10681-013-0967-2.
- Lee JM, Kubota C, Tsao SJ, Bie Z, Hoyos E, Morra L and Oda M. 2010. Current status of vegetable grafting: diffusion, grafting techniques, automation. Scientia Horticulture 127: 93-105. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.08.003.
- Lenecci MS, Cadinu D, Taurino M, Piro G and Dalessandro G. 2006. Antioxidant composition in cherry and high pigment tomato cultivars. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 2606-13. doi: 10.1021/jf052920c.
- Lin C, Hsu S, Tzeng K and Wang J. 2008. Application of a preliminary screen to select locally adapted resistant rootstock and soil amendment for integrated management of tomato bacterial wilt in Taiwan. Plant Disease 92: 909-916. doi: 10.1094/pdis-92-6-0909
- Lopez-Marin J, Galvez A, Del Amar FM, Albecete A, Fernandez JA, Egea-Gilabert C and Perez-Alfocea F.
- Selecting vegetative/ generative/dwarfing rootstocks for improving fruit yield and quality in water stressed sweet peppers. Scientia Horticulture 214: 9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2016.11.012.
- Lopez-Marin J, Gonzalez A, Perez-Alfocea F, EgeaGilabert C and Fernandez JA. 2013. Grafting is an efficient alternative to shading screens to alleviate thermal stress in greenhouse-grown sweet pepper. Scientia Horticulture 149: 39-46. doi: 10.1016/ j.scienta.2012.02.034.
- Lopez-Perez JA, Strange ML, Kaloshian I and Ploeg AT. 2006. Differential response of mi gene-resistant tomato rootstocks to root-knot nematodes. (Meloidogyne incognita). Crop Protection 25: 382-88. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2005.07.001
- Martinez-Andujar C, Ruiz-Lozano JM, Dodd IC, Albacete A and Perez-Alfocea F. 2017. Hormonal and nutritional features in contrasting rootstock-mediated tomato growth under low phosphorus nutrition. Frontiers Plant Science: 533. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00533
- Mcavoy T, Paret M, Freeman JH, Rideout S, Olson SM. 2012. Evaluation of grafting using hybrid rootstocks for management of bacterial wilt in ûeld tomato production. Hort Science 47: 621-25. doi: 10.21273/hortsci.47.5.621
- Medina-Filho HP and Stevens MA. 1980. Tomato breeding for nematode resistance: Survey of resistant varieties for horticultural characteristics and genotype of acid phosphates. Acta Horticulture 100: 383-91. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1980.100.41
- Meng XD, Ma H, Wei M and Xing YX. 1999. Breeding of vegetable crops for protected growing conditions. Acta Horticulture 481: 695-99. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1999.481.83
- Mero CE. 1983. The inheritance of bolt resistance in an interspecific cross Siberian kale (Brassica napus) x Chinese cabbage (B. campestris ssp. pekinensis) and an intraspecific cross Chinese cabbage x turnip (B. campestris ssp. rapifera), Ph. D. thesis Abstract 44: 701-02.
- Mishra GP, Singh N, Kumar H and Singh SB. 2010. Protected Cultivation for food and nutritional Security at Ladakh. Defence Science Journal 61: 219-25.
- Mishra SN, Sahoo SC, Lotha RE and Mishra RS. 1991. Heterosis and combining ability for seed characters in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 61: 123-25.
- More TA and Budgujar CD. 2002. Isolation of parthenocarpic tropical gynoecious lines in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Acta Horticultural 588: 255-60. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.588.39
- More TA and Munger HM. 1986. Gynoecious sex expression and stability in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Euphytica 35 : 899-903. doi: 10.1007/BF00028598
- More TA. 2002. Development and exploitation of tropical gynoecious lines in F hybrid of cucumber. Acta 1 Horticulture 588: 261-267. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2002.588.40
- Morelock TE and Correll JC. 2005. Spinach breeding in the mid-south. National Spinach Conference, Fayetteville, AR USA, pp14.
- Munshi AD, Kumar R and Panda B. 2007. Heterosis for yield and its component in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Vegetable Science 32: 133-135.
- Nilsen ET, Freeman J, Grene R and Tokuhisa J. 2014. A rootstock provides water conservation for a grafted commercial tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) line in response to mild drought conditions: A focus on vegetative growth and photosynthetic parameters. PLoS One 9 : e115380. doi : 10.1371/journal.pone.0115380
- Niu XK, Leung H and Williams PH. 1984. Sources and nature of resistance to downy mildew and turnip mosaic in Chinese cabbage. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Sciences 108: 115.
- Noll F. 1902. Fruchtbildingohnevorausgegangene bestaubung (parthenokarpie) bei der gurke. Gesellschaft fur Natur-u. Heilkundezu Bonn. 106: 149-62.
- Nuez F. 1986. Solanaceae breeding for protected cultivation. Acta Horticulture 191: 317-30. Doi: 10.17660/ ActaHortic.1986.191.36
- Orton TJ, Durgan ME and Hulbert SH. 1984. Studies on the inheritance of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. apii in celery. Plant Disease 68: 574.
- Pereira MJZ, Massola JNS, Sussel AAB, Sala FC, Costa CP and Boiteux LS. 2011. Reacao de acessos de Capsicum ede progenies decruz amentosintere specificosaisolados de Colletotrichum acutatum. Hortic Brasileira 29, 569-576. Doi: 10.1590/S010205362011000400021
- Phillips RL. 1999. Research needs in heterosis. In: Coors JG and Pandey S. (eds.), Genetics and Exploitation of Heterosis in Crops. American Society of AgronomyCrop Science Society of America, pp 501-507.
- Poulos MJ. 1994. Pepper breeding (Capsicum spp.): Achievements, Challenges and Possibilities. Plant Breeding 64: 143-154.
- Quiros CF. 1987. Breeding celery for disease resistance and improved quality, California Celery Research Advisory Board Annual Report. 1986-1987.
- Rajasekar M., Arumugam T and Ramesh KS. 2013. Influence of weather and growing environment on vegetable growth and yield. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry 5: 160-167. doi: 10.5897/jhf2013.0317
- Rivard CL and Louws FJ. 2008. Grafting to manage soil borne diseases in heirloom tomato production. Hort Sc i enc e 43: 2104-2111. doi : 10.21273/hortsci.43.7.2104
- Rivard CL, O’Connell S, Peet MM and Louws FJ. 2010. Grafting tomato with interspeciûc rootstock to manage diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and southern root-knot nematode. Plant Disease 94: 101521. doi: 10.1094/pdis-94-8-1015
- Sanchez-Rodriguez E., Romero L and Ruiz MJ. 2013. Role of grafting in resistance to water stress in tomato plants: Ammonia production and assimilation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulators 32: 831-842. doi: 10.1007/s00344-013-9348-2
- Scott JW, Wang J and Hanson P. 2005. Breeding tomatoes for resistance to bacterial wilt, a global view. International Symposium on Tomato Diseases, Orlando, FL, pp 161-72.
- Serquan FC, Bachar J and Staub JE. 1997. Genetic analysis of yield components in cucumber at low plant density. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Science 12: 522-28.
- Singh B. 2012. Protected cultivation of horticultural crops in India: Challenges and opportunities. Agrotechnol 2: 51.
- Singh DK and Peter KV. 2014. Protected cultivation of horticultural crops. New India Publication Agency, New Delhi-110034.
- Singh HP and Malhotra SK. 2012. Current scenario and policy issues for protected cultivation of horticultural crops in India. Proceedings, National Seminar on Protected Cultivation of Vegetables and Flowers-A Value Chain Approach. GBPUAT, Pant Nagar, pp 920.
- Singh S and Bainsha NK. 2015. Analysis of Climate Change Impacts and their Mitigation Strategies on Vegetable Sector in Tropical Islands of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. Indian Journal of Horticulture 2: 126.
- Singh T, Singh N, Bahuguna A, Nautiyal M and Sharma VK. 2014. Performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrids for growth, yield and quality inside polyhouse under mid hill condition of Uttarakhand. American Journal of Drug Discovery Development 4: 202-09.
- Sokova D, Niamoye Y, Paul N, Oligorite A, Aminata D, Kadiadiatou G, Aissata T, Seribakatil E and Doule D. 2013. Overview of pepper (Capsicum sp.) breeding in West Africa. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8: 1108-1114.
- Stephenson AG. 1981. Flower and seed abortion: proximate causes and ultimate functions. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 12: 253-79.
- Sturtevant EL. 1890. Seedless fruits. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 1, 141-85.
- Talisha JJA, Sabah SS and Mahmoud MR. 2020. Effects of breeding methods and nitrogen fertilization on growth traits and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) yield under protected conditions. Plant Archives 20: 178-80.
- Tiwari R. 2015. Molecular characterization and genetical studies in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Doctoral Thesis, Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, India, pp 129.
- Traveset A. 1993. Deceptive fruits reduce insect seed predation in Pistacia terebinthus L. Evolutionary Ecology 7: 357-361.
- Turhan A, Ozmen N, Serbeci MS and Seniz V. 2011. Effects of grafting on different rootstocks on tomato fruit yield and quality. Horticultural Science 38: 142-149.
- Tuzel Y and Leonardi C. 2009. Protected cultivation in Mediterranean region: trends and needs. J Ege Univ Fac Agric 46: 215-223.
- Verdu M and Garcia-Fayos P. 1998. Ecological causes, function, and evolution of abortion and parthenocarpy in Pistacia lentiscus (Anacardiaceae). Canadian Journal of Botany 76: 134-41.
- Vrcek IV, Samobor M, Bojic M, Medic-Saric M, Vukobratovic R., Erhatic R, Horvat D and Matota N Z. 2011. The effect of grafting on the antioxidant properties of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 9: 844-851.
- Wani KP, Singh PK, Amin A, Mushtaq F and Dar ZA. 2011. Protected cultivation of tomato, capsicum and cucumber under Kashmir Valley conditions. Asian Journal of Science and Technology 1: 56-61.
- Williamson VM. 1998. Root-knot resistance genes in tomato and their potential for future use. Annual Reviews on Phytopathology 36: 277-93.
- Yuen JE. 1991. Resistance to Peronospora parasitica in Chinese cabbage. Plant Disease 10.
- Evaluation, genetic variability, correlation and path analysis studies in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes
Abstract Views :111 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Hem Lata
1,
Akhilesh Sharma
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science & Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science & Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 01 (2022), Pagination: 56-64Abstract
The experimental materials comprising of fourteen chilli genotypes including ‘Surajmukhi’ as standard check were evaluated to examine the nature of variability, heritability, genetic advance, correlation and association of various traits with marketable yield. Analysis of variance showed significant differences among the genotypes in terms of both quantitative and qualitative traits. The yield potential of two genotypes, Him Palam Mirch-2 and DPCh-101 was significantly higher than that of check ‘Surajmukhi’. High PCV and GCV was recorded for average green fruit weight, marketable green fruits per plant, non-marketable green fruits per plant and total green fruits per plant. High heritability along with high genetic advance was observed for primary branches per plant, internodal length, secondary branches per plant, fruit length, average green fruit weight, marketable green fruits per plant, non–marketable green fruits per plant, total green fruits per plant and marketable fruit yield per plant. Correlation studies showed that marketable green fruits per plant, total green fruits per plant, per cent marketable green fruits per plant and fruit girth had positive significant association, with marketable yield per plant indicating the importance of these traits in selection for yield. Path analysis revealed that total green fruits per plant, average green fruit weight, percent marketable green fruits per plant, fruit length, primary branches per plant and days to first harvest had the maximum positive direct effect on marketable green fruit yield per plant indicating that these traits are the main contributors to fruit yield. Based on these results, it can be concluded that due consideration should be focused on primary and secondary branches, fruit length, average fruit weight, number of fruits per plant and harvest duration for genetic improvement of chilli.
Keywords
Chilli, correlation, heritability, genetic advance, path analysisFull Text
References
- Akula S, Abebie B, Wagori D and Adetris T. 2016. Genetic variability and association of characters in Ethiopian hot pepper (Capsicum annum L.) land races. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 61: 19-36.
- Al-Jibouri HA, Miller PA and Robinson HF.1958.Genotypic and environmental variance and co-variance in upland cotton crops of inter-specific origin. Agronomy Journal 50: 633-636.
- Azadani HS. 2020. Genetic variability, genetic divergence studies for yield and yield related traits in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) germplasm. M Sc Thesis, p 190.
- Department of vegetable science, College of Horticulture, Sri Konda Laxman Telangana State Horticultural University (unpublished) Bozokalfa MK, Esiyok D, Ilbi H and Kaygisiz AT. 2010.
- Estimates of genetic variability and association studies in quantitative plant traits of Eruca spp. landraces. Genetika 42: 501-512.
- Burton GW and De Vane EH. 1953. Estimating heritability in tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) from replicated clonal material. Agronomy Journal 54: 478-481.
- Deepo DM, Sarker A, Akter S, Islam Md. M, Hasan M and Zeba N. 2020. Diversity and path analysis in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) based on morphological traits in Northern region of Bangladesh. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology 8: 179-185.
- Dewey DR and Lu KH. 1959. A correlation and path analysis of components of crested wheat-grass seed production. Agronomy Journal 51: 515-518.
- Farwah S, Hussain K, Rizvi S, Hussain SM, Rashid M and Saleem S. 2020. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance studies in chili (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes. International Journal of Chemical Studies 8: 1328-1331
- Gokulakrishnan J, Nagaraja C, Ranjith Rajaram S and Prakash M. 2020.Genetic variability and correlation studies in chilli (Capsicum annum L.).Plant Archives 20: 686-690.
- Hazra P, Chattopadhyay A, Karmakar K and Dutta S. 2011. Modern Technology in Vegetable Production. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, India, pp. 413.
- Johnson HW, Robinson, HF and Comstock RE. 1955. Estimates of phenotypic and genotypic correlation in soybean and their implications in selection. Agronomy Journal 47: 477-482.
- Kumar D, Rangare VB and Singh SBD. 2012. Genetic variability, heritability and correlation studies in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). HortFlora Research Spectrum 1: 248-252.
- Meena ML, Kumar N, Meena JK and Rai T. 2016.Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). HortFlora Research Spectrum 5: 153-156.
- Megharaj KC, Ajjappalavara, PS, Satish D and Tatagar MH. 2017. Estimation of genetic variation, path analysis and thrips reaction studies for yield and yield attributing traits in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Plant Archives 17: 353-361.
- Negi PS and Sharma A. 2019. Studies on Variability, Correlation and Path Analysis in Red Ripe Chilli Genotypes. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 8: 1604-1612.
- Ngullie R and Biswas PK. 2019.Vegetative growth and yield performance of four chilli (Capsicum annuum l.) Cultivars under Mokokchung district of Nagaland. International Journal of Agriculture Sciences 11 (3): 7833-7835.
- NHB. 2020 . http://nhb.gov.in/statistics/State_Level/201718-(Final).pdf Okuyama LA, Fedeizi LC and Barbosa JF. 2004. Correlation and path analysis of yield and its components and plant traits in wheat. Ciência Rural 6: 1701-1708.
- Pandit MK and Adhikary S. 2014. Variability and heritability estimates in some reproductive characters and yield in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). International Journal of Plant and Soil Science 3: 845-853.
- Panse VG and Sukhatme PV. 1985. Statistical methods for agricultural workers. Ed. 4th, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.
- Patel DK, Patel BR, Patel JR and Kuchhadiya GV. 2015. Genetic variability and character association studies for green fruit yield and quality component traits in chilli. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 6: 472-478.
- Salvador MH. 2002. Genetic resources of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) in Mexico Proceedings of the 16th Int. Pepper Conf., Tampico, Tamaulipas, Mexico, November. Pp. 10-12.
- Sekhon BS, Sharma A, Katoch V, Kapila RK and Sood VK. 2019. Assessment of genetic diversity in advanced breeding lines derived from intraspecific crosses of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research 42: 145-152.
- Sharma A, Sekhon BS, Sharma S and Kumar R. 2020. Newly isolated intervarietal garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) progenies (F7) under north western Himalayan conditions of India. Experimental Agriculture 56: 7687.
- Sharma KC, Verma S, Sharma A and Sharma P. 2010. Genetic divergence and path analysis in early maturing garden peas. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 35: 176-179.
- Sharma S, Barche S, Sengupta SK, Verma BK and Jamkar T. 2014. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). International Journal of Farm Sciences 4: 112-116.
- Sood S, Kumar Naveen, Chandel KS and Sharma Parveen. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81 (7): 590-594.
- Sood T, Basandrai D, Rana V and Basandrai AK. 2020. Genetic diversity analysis for various agro morphological, yield and yield related traits in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 46: 136-144.
- Srinivas J, Ravinder Reddy K, Saidaiah P, Anitha PK and Pandravada SR. 2017. Performance of Chilli Genotypes for Yield and Yield Attributes of Fruit Quality in Southern Telangana, India. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 6: 469-477.
- Srinivas J, Reddy KR, Saidaiah P, Anitha K, Pandravada SR and Balram M. 2020. Correlation and path analysis study in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes. International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry 21: 1-11.
- Yatung T, Dubey KR, Singh V, Upadhyay G and Pandey AK. 2014. Selection parameters for fruit yield and related traits in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Bangladesh Journal of Botany 43: 283-291.
- Influence of GA and NAA on growth, yield and quality of tomato 3 (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
Abstract Views :61 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 01 (2022), Pagination: 65-70Abstract
GA and NAA affect various aspects of plant physiology, mainly vegetative, flowering and quality attributes 3 including yield. A field experiment was carried out during 2020-21 at vegetable farm of CSKHPKV, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh to evaluate the effects of foliar-applied plant growth regulators gibberellic acid (GA ) and 3 Naphthalene Acidic Acid (NAA) on tomato hybrid Palam Tomato Hybrid-1. Significant impact of GA and 3 NAA at different concentrations was observed on yield and quality parameters of tomato. Among the different treatments plant growth regulators GA @75 ppm resulted maximum number of fruits per plant, fruit weight 3 and marketable yield per plant, marketable yield per m2 area, ascorbic acid content plant height and minimum number of days to 50 % flowering.Keywords
NAA, GA , protected, tomato, yieldFull Text
References
- Aloni B, Daie J and Wyse RE. 1968. Enhancement of (14C)sucrose export from source leaves of Vicia faba by gibberellic acid. Plant Physiology 82: 962-966.
- Batlang V, VE Emongor, F Pule-Meulenburg. 2006. Effect of benzyladenine and gibberellic acid on yield and yield components of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. ‘tempo’). Journal of Agronomy 5(3):418-423.
- Chaudhary BR, Sharma MD, Shakya SM and Gautam DM. 2006. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) at Rampur, Chitwan. Journal of Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science 27: 65-68.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York pp 680.
- Kannan K. Jawaharlal M and Prabhu M. 2009. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth and yield parameters of paprika cv. KtPl-19. Agricultural Science Digest 29: 157-162.
- Mehraj H, Sadia AA, Taufique T, Rashid M and Jamal Uddin AFM. 2014. Influence of foliar application of gibberellic acid on cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. Cerasiforme). Journal of Experimental Bioscience 5: 27-30.
- Mostafa EAM and Saleh MMS. 2006. Influence of spraying with gibberellic acid on behavior of anna apple trees. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2: 477-483.
- Rafeekher M, SA Nair, PN Sorte, GP Hatwal, PM Chandhan. 2002. Effect of growth regulators on growth and yield of summer cucumber. Journal of Soils Crops 12 (1):108-110.
- Ranjeet, Ram RB, Jay P and Meena ML. 2014. Growth, flowering, fruiting, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced plant bio regulators. International Journal of Plant Science 9: 6771.
- Sood S, Kumar Naveen, Chandel KS and Sharma Parveen. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(7): 590-594.
- Sun YL and Hong SK. 2010. Effects of plant growth regulators and L-glutamic acid on shoot organogenesis in the halophyte Leymus chinensis (Trin.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 100:317-328.
- Ujjwal Vivak, Singh Manoj Kumar, Dev Pavitra, Chaudhary Mohit, Kumar Ashish and Tomar Saurabh. 2018. Effect of different levels of GA and NAA on 3 vegetative growth and flowering parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry SP1: 146-148.
- Influence of heterografting on growth and yield characteristics of Pomato grafts
Abstract Views :154 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062,, IN
2 Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharmshala, IN
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062,, IN
2 Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharmshala, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 210-219Abstract
The present study was conducted at Vegetable Research Farm of CSK HPKV, Palampur during the year 2019- 20 and 2020-21. The experimentation was designed in RCBD along with three replications. The data was worked out for various growth and yield of tomato and potato of pomato grafts. The outcomes of the investigation presented that maximum plant height (272.90 cm), number of fruits per cluster (8.20), fruit yield per pant (4.11 kg), tuber yield per square meter (5.44 kg), was calculated for the graft combinations i.e. K. Himalini + Rakshita, K. Himalini + PTH-1, K. Pukhraj + Avtar. Observations from the recorded data also proved that K. Jyoti+ Avtar and K. Jyoti + PTH-1 took minimum number of days for first flowering and days to harvest in case of tomato and potato i.e. 49.70 and 72.04. Hence, these graft combinations can be further recommended to grower, so they can fetch more yield from the limited land holding.Keywords
Pomato, graft combinations, yield, growth, tomato fruits, potato tuber.Full Text
References
- Arefin SMA, Zeba N, Solaiman AH, Naznin MT, Azad MOK, Tabassum M and Park CH. 2019. Evaluation of compatibility, growth characteristics, and yield of tomato grafted on potato (‘Pomato’). Horticulturae 5 (37): 1-9.
- Bahadur A, Singh AK, Nadeem MA and Singh J. 2020. Pomato: Harnessing twin benefits of potato and tomato grafting. Indian Horticulture pp 30-32.
- Eppakayala K, Pidigam S, Natarajan S, Amarapalli G and Komatireddy RR. 2021. Study of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield parameters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) germplasm. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 10: 768-771.
- Giosanu D, Uleanu F, Trãneci S and Vulpe M. 2020. Aspects regarding the behavior of tomatoes grafted on potatoes. Current Trends in Natural Sciences 9 (17): 205-209.
- Gisbert C, Prohens J, Raigon MD, Stommel JR and Nuez F. 2011. Eggplant relatives as sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: effects of grafting on eggplant yield and fruit apparent quality and composition. Scientia Horticulturae 128:14-22.
- Haberal M, Korpe DA, Iseri OD and Sahin FI. 2016. Grafting tomato onto tobacco rootstocks is a practical and feasible application for higher growth and leafing in different tobacco–tomato unions. Biological, Agriculture & Horticulture 32:248-257.
- Kumar J, Singh N, Dixit PS, Yadav L, Singh BPand Tomar S. 2020. Estimation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for growth and yield attributes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Archives 20:503-505.
- Kumar P, Negi V, Sharma P, Raj D, Singh A and Vats B. 2016. Grafting tomato on potato rootstocks and its effect on quality traits. Vegetable Science 43(2):263-365.
- Kumar S, Kumar P, Sharma P, Sankhyan NK and Anjali. 2021. Effect of fertilizers and fertigation treatments on pomato growth and yield under protected environments. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 10 (2): 2813-2820.
- Kumar P, Rana S, Sharma P and Negi V. 2015. Vegetable grafting: A boon to vegetable growers to combat biotic and abiotic stresses. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41:1-5
- Panchbhaiya A, Singh DK, Verma P and Mallesh S. 2018. Assessment of genetic variability in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Under polyhouse condition for fruit quality and biochemical traits. International Journal of Chemical Studies 6: 245-248.
- Pooja HM, Gasti VD, Bhavidoddi A, Yashvantkumar HK, Prashantha A and Srikantaprasad D. 2022. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in determinate types of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The Pharma Innovation 11(4): 222-225.
- Rick CM and Chetelat RT. 1995. Utilization of related wild species for tomato improvement. Acta Horticulturae 412: 21-38.
- Sood S, Kumar N, Chandel KS and Sharma P. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. Grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81: 590-594.
- Tessema L, Mohammed W and Abebe T. 2020. Evaluation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties for yield and some agronomic traits. Open Agriculture 5:63-74.
- Thamburaj S and Singh N. 2016. Textbook of vegetables, tuber crops and spices. Sixth edition. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 26-28.
- Zhang G and Guo H. 2018. Effects of tomato and potato hetero grafting on photosynthesis, quality and yield of grafted parents. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 60:9-18.